Skip to content

120+ questions · 16 categories · free to copy · updated July 2026

Membership survey questions that earn their place

A bank of ready-to-use questions grouped by what you are trying to find out: satisfaction, value, loyalty, benefits, engagement, joining, events, digital, pricing, governance, renewal and exit. Filter them, copy them, use them.

Then the harder half: how to word a question so the answer is worth having, cited to the UK Government’s own questionnaire design guidance rather than to whatever the last survey tool’s blog said.

Survey builderfive jobs

  1. 01Onboarding pulsenew members, 30 days in4 QS
  2. 02Annual satisfactionwhole base, once a year8 QS
  3. 03At-risk / renewalmembers whose engagement has dropped4 QS
  4. 04Exitmembers who have just lapsed5 QS
  5. 05Post-eventattendees, within 24 hours4 QS

Question ordereasy first, sensitive last

120+
questions, free to copy
The question bank, below ↗
16
categories by what you need to know
The full bank, below ↗
5–7
scale points, all labelled
GSS guidance · Krosnick & Presser 2010 ↗
38%
of associations survey members annually
MGI 2024 · US industry survey ↗

01/ the wording problem

The same question, asked two ways, is two different questions

This is not a stylistic point. Pew Research Center asked Americans whether they would favour military action in Iraq, then asked again with one clause added: “even if it meant that U.S. forces might suffer thousands of casualties”.

A majority in favour became a minority. Same topic, same population, different question.

Order does it too. Pew asked about legal agreements for same-sex couples before and after a question on marriage, and support moved with the position.

Your member survey has the same physics. “How great was the event?” and “How would you rate the event?” do not measure the same thing, and only one of them tells you anything you can act on.

Still deciding which survey to run? Start with our guide to membership surveys; this page is the question bank you build them from.

  • Favoured military action in Iraq (wording)68%Asked one way: 68%. Asked the other: 43%.
  • Favoured legal agreements (order)37%Asked one way: 37%. Asked the other: 45%.

Share in favour. Wording: January 2003, without and with the casualties clause. Order: October 2003, asked first and asked after the marriage question. Pew Research Center, Writing survey questions · research organisation, split-sample experiments.

Adding one clause

Pew asked whether people would favour military action in Iraq. Then they asked the same question with one clause added.

  • “…favor or oppose taking military action in Iraq to end Saddam Hussein’s rule” — 68% in favour
  • “…even if it meant that U.S. forces might suffer thousands of casualties” — 43% in favour

Sources for each example are linked in the sources list — Pew Research Center for the survey experiments, the UK Government Statistical Service for the design rules.

02/ your survey

Pick your organisation and goal, once

Set these two and the rest of the page answers for you.

The survey builder opens on your job. The question bank filters to your category. The length chart marks your survey, and the last section names the page with the full method.

The organisation type adds one question that fits how your members relate to you: a career for a professional body, representation for a trade association, a cause for a charity, the next two years for a club.

Nothing you pick is stored or sent. Change it as often as you like.

Your surveyset once, used below

Organisation

What the survey is for

8questions

Length

8 questions · 3–4 minutes

Who

Whole base, once a year

  1. Overall, how satisfied are you with your membership?
  2. Does your membership deliver good value for the fee?
  3. Which benefits have you used in the last 12 months?
  4. How connected do you feel to the member community?
  5. How relevant is the content we send you?
  6. How likely are you to recommend us to a peer or colleague?
  7. What is the main reason for the score you gave?
  8. What is the one thing we could do to improve your membership?

One to add for a professional bodyHow well do our benefits fit the stage you are at in your career?

Read next: Member satisfaction survey

Question counts and timings are our guidance for each job, not a published standard. Every question is from the bank on this page.

03/ question types

Six response types, and the job each one does

Scales to trend, choice to decide, open text to understand. The response type should follow from what you will do with the answer — which is also the test for whether the question belongs in the survey at all.

One caveat that survey methodology is firm about and most membership surveys ignore: agree/disagree and yes/no formats invite people to agree regardless of content. Use them sparingly.

Open and closed are not two routes to the same answer. When Pew offered “the economy” in a list, far more people chose it than volunteered it in their own words.

So write a closed list from what members actually say, and keep it short. Pew’s guidance is “just four or perhaps five at most”, especially by telephone; factual and demographic questions can carry more.

  • Named “the economy” as the issue that mattered most35%Open text: 35%. Offered in a list: 58%.

The same question after the 2008 US presidential election, asked open to one half of the sample and with five options to the other. Pew Research Center, Writing survey questions · research organisation, split-sample experiment.

Job: use it to trend

Rating scale

A 1–5 or 1–10 scale for satisfaction, ease or agreement. Fast to answer and easy to trend over time — the workhorse of member surveys.

Fifty questions in a list is not a resource. A resource is one you can choose from.

04/ the question bank

120+ membership survey questions, by category

Filter by what you need to find out, or by response type. Click any question to copy it. Copy a whole category if you want a starting set to cut down rather than a blank page to fill.

Every question below also appears as plain text further down the page, so you can read the whole bank without touching a control — and so can anything else that reads this page.

Pick a goal in your survey and the bank filters to the matching category. Reset the filters to see everything again.

Filter & copy122 questions

122 of 122 shown — click any question to copy it

05/ build a survey

Pick the job, get a question set

Most membership surveys fail before they are written, by trying to do five jobs at once. Choose the one decision the survey has to inform and the shape follows: how many questions, which types, in what order.

These are starting sets, not templates to send as-is. Cut anything you would not act on.

If you picked a goal above, the builder has opened on it. Engagement has no pulse here: its starter set is in the picker.

Survey builder5 jobs

8questions

Who

Whole base, once a year

Length

8 questions · 3–4 minutes

  1. Overall, how satisfied are you with your membership?
  2. Does your membership deliver good value for the fee?
  3. Which benefits have you used in the last 12 months?
  4. How connected do you feel to the member community?
  5. How relevant is the content we send you?
  6. How likely are you to recommend us to a peer or colleague?
  7. What is the main reason for the score you gave?
  8. What is the one thing we could do to improve your membership?

Question order follows the UK Government Statistical Service rule: start with easy questions and work up to harder or more sensitive ones, because difficult questions early increase drop-out.

06/ clubs

Questions to ask club members, area by area

A club survey asks about a place and a season, not a profession: the courts or pitch, the coaching, the clubhouse, the committee.

The Lawn Tennis Association’s guide to membership surveys recommends two “golden questions” at every opportunity: how likely members are to recommend the club, and how likely they are to still be a member in two years.

Timing matters as much as wording. The LTA suggests running the full survey towards the end of the season, when members have used the facilities most. One part of the club per survey is fine.

Pick from the areas alongside. The golden questions are already in; add only what the committee will act on this season, then copy the set into your survey tool.

The two to always ask · tap to add or remove

3 questions in your club survey

Areas covered: 2 of 8 · The two to always ask, Anything else

  1. How likely is it that you would recommend [club] to friends, family or colleagues?
  2. How likely is it that you will still be a member of [club] in two years?
  3. What one thing would make the club better for you?

The two golden questions are from the Lawn Tennis Association’s guide; the rest are written for any club. Replace [club] with your club’s name.

Sport England built a free club survey tool, Club Views, into its Club Matters support for grassroots clubs, for asking members and volunteers what they think. Sets by club type and by moment, with a short survey builder, are on questions to ask club members.

Asking who would volunteer is research, not marketing. But keep fixtures, fee reminders and bar offers out of the invitation (research or marketing?).

07/ needs assessment

Needs assessment survey questions, asked in pairs

A needs assessment asks what members need before you decide what to offer. So each need is asked twice: how important is it, and how satisfied are you with how we provide it.

That pairing is importance–performance analysis, set out by Martilla and James in the Journal of Marketing in 1977: plot the two answers and every need lands in one of four quadrants.

The quadrant that earns the budget is top left, “Concentrate here”: important to members, and you are falling short. Bottom right, “Possible overkill”, is the finding people miss: something you do well that members barely value, and a candidate to scale back.

University of Florida extension guidance uses the same plot to prioritise its own programmes.

Name your needs, set the two ratings and watch where each lands, then copy the question pairs. Label every point of both scales, as the GSS guidance advises, and open with a few questions that let members name needs you did not list.

Needs assessment · importance against satisfaction

Concentrate hereKeep up the good work
Low priorityPossible overkill
↑ How important it isHow well we meet it →

Training and CPD lands in

Concentrate here

Starting positions are placeholders to move, not survey data. Quadrant names from Martilla & James, Journal of Marketing, 1977. The crosshairs sit at each scale’s neutral midpoint; an alternative is the average of all your needs.

Ask these first, so members can name their own needs

  1. 01What is the biggest challenge in your work over the next 12 months?
  2. 02Where do you go for help with it today?
  3. 03What do you get elsewhere that you would rather get from us?
  4. 04Which skills do you expect to need in the next two years?
  5. 05If your budget were cut, what would you stop paying for first?

08/ new members

New member survey questions, timed to the first year

New members are the ones most likely to leave: first-year renewal is the weakest number in the sector’s benchmarks, as the chart shows. What a new member can tell you changes as the year goes on, so the questions change too.

In the first week they can tell you about joining: why now, how they heard, how easy it was. By day 30, whether they have used anything.

By day 90, whether it is worth it — the check-in our member surveys hub builds a whole survey around. Before the first renewal, whether they will stay.

Ask three or four questions at each stop, not the whole set at once, and fold the early stops into your onboarding rather than sending separate surveys — the sequence itself lives on member onboarding. The reminders that follow belong to membership renewals.

New member survey questions, by moment

Week 1 · the joining experience

Ask
In the first week, with the welcome
Length
Three or four questions

Timings are our guidance, not a standard. Tap a question to copy it, or copy a whole stop.

Associations by first-year renewal rate

  • 80% or higher46%
  • 60–79%29%
  • Below 60%24%
Share of associations reporting each first-year renewal rate (n = 333); the median is 75%. Marketing General Inc., 2024 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report · US industry survey of association staff.

09/ scales

How many points, and should there be a middle?

Two credible sources, one compatible answer.

The UK Government Statistical Service recommends a minimum of five points, notes seven gives more detail, and says the scale “should always include a neutral option in the middle”.

Krosnick and Presser’s review of the methodology literature concludes that “7-point scales are probably optimal in many instances”.

Both agree on the part most surveys get wrong: label every point with words, not just the ends. Reliability is higher when you do.

Scale designer7 points

Strongly disagreeDisagreeSlightly disagreeNeitherSlightly agreeAgreeStrongly agree

Midpoint present. Both sources support this. This is the configuration both sources point at: seven labelled points with a midpoint.

10/ bias

Spot the question that has already decided the answer

Six real patterns, each one drawn from the UK Government Statistical Service’s own guidance or from survey-methodology research. Read the question, call it, then see what is wrong with it and how to fix it.

The one people miss most often is acquiescence — the tendency to agree with an assertion regardless of its content, which is why agree/disagree formats are riskier than they look.

Leading or neutral?1 / 6

“How would you rate the event?”

11/ nps

Net Promoter Score, with the caveat attached

The question, the 0–10 scale and the promoter / passive / detractor bands all come from Reichheld’s Harvard Business Review article of December 2003 — not, as is often written, from a later book. Move the sliders to see how the score behaves.

And the part vendors leave out: a 2007 replication in the Journal of Marketing using 21 firms and 15,500+ interviews “fails to replicate his assertions regarding the ‘clear superiority’ of Net Promoter”. Use NPS as a trend line you own, not as proof of anything.

NPS calculator · 0–10

Net Promoter Score

+40

Promoters minus detractors, as percentages of all respondents. Passives count towards the total but not the score — which is why NPS can move without anyone changing their mind about you. It is a trend line you own, not evidence. A 2007 replication in the Journal of Marketing failed to reproduce its claimed superiority over other loyalty measures.

12/ length

Short beats thorough, and the evidence says so carefully

A randomised experiment in Public Opinion Quarterly found that “the longer the stated length, the fewer respondents started and completed the questionnaire” — and that later questions attract shorter response times, higher item non-response and shorter open answers.

What that evidence does not license is a coefficient. It tested stated lengths of 10, 20 and 30 minutes in one online panel in 2009. Anyone quoting you “every question over twelve costs 5% completion” is quoting a vendor’s own platform data, not research.

Length & drop-offdirection only

completion →

fewer questionsmore questions

Deliberately unlabelled on the vertical axis. The shape is evidenced; the numbers are not. This chart shows a direction, and the page will not invent a percentage to make it look more precise than the research is.

Starting length, by jobyours: satisfaction and value

Questions in each starter set on this page — our guidance, not a standard. Yours is in ember: 8 questions · 3–4 minutes. The direction (longer stated length, fewer starts and completions) is from Galesic & Bosnjak, Public Opinion Quarterly, 2009 · peer-reviewed.

So the length that matters is the one you choose. The second chart sets our starting length for each job side by side, with yours marked.

A triggered pulse should stay small enough to answer on a phone. The annual survey can carry more, because it is the one members expect.

13/ the law

Is your member survey research, or is it marketing?

It matters, because the answer decides whether you need consent to send it. The ICO is explicit that “genuine market research does not count as direct marketing” — but that a survey carrying promotional material, or collecting details for future campaigns, is direct marketing and the PECR rules apply.

For a not-for-profit the trap is sharper than it looks: PECR’s definition covers material “promoting the aims or ideals of not-for-profit organisations”. A renewal nudge in your satisfaction survey converts the whole email.

Survey or marketing?4 checks

Genuine research

On the ICO’s guidance, “genuine market research does not count as direct marketing”, so PECR’s consent rules do not bite. You still need a UK GDPR lawful basis to process members’ personal data — for a membership body surveying its own members that is usually legitimate interests.

A survey is not a way of finding out what members think. It is a way of finding out what you are going to do.

General information, not legal advice. Statements reflect ICO guidance as at August 2025, when the Data (Use and Access) Act moved the direct-marketing definition into PECR.

14/ the full bank

All 120+ membership survey questions

The complete library in plain text, grouped by category. This is the same set the filter above draws from — it reads these questions directly, so what you see here is what you get there. Copy anything.

Member satisfaction survey questions

Measure how members feel about membership overall — your headline health metric.

  • Overall, how satisfied are you with your membership?
  • How well does your membership meet your expectations?
  • How would you rate the quality of what your membership provides?
  • Compared with a year ago, is your membership experience better or worse?
  • How satisfied are you with the support you receive as a member?
  • How easy is it to get help when you need it?
  • What has been the best thing about your membership this year?
  • What has been the most frustrating?
  • If you could change one thing about how membership works, what would it be?

On the demographic questions

If you ask about ethnicity, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, health or socio-economic background, use the Government Statistical Service harmonised standards rather than writing your own. They exist precisely so results are comparable, and using them means your data can sit alongside national statistics instead of floating free.

Two caveats worth knowing. The harmonised ethnicity standard dates from 2011 and is under active review.

And these are special category data under UK GDPR — see “is it really anonymous” below.

15/ writing them well

Six rules, and where each one comes from

The original six rules on this page were right. What they lacked was a source, so here they are again, each attached to the guidance or research that supports it.

The UK Government publishes questionnaire design guidance that essentially nobody in the membership sector cites. It is better than most of what survey vendors publish.

01 · GSS questionnaire design guidance

Ask one thing at a time

Split double-barrelled questions, or you can’t act on the answer.

02 · GSS · Pew Research Center

Keep it neutral

No question that leads towards an answer. Balance it with “if any”.

03 · GSS questionnaire design guidance

Use plain language

No jargon or internal terms. A member who has to re-read will skip or guess.

04 · Krosnick & Presser 2010

Match the type to the goal

Scales to trend, choice to decide, open text to understand.

05 · Judgement, labelled as such

Only ask what you’ll act on

Every question costs completion, so one that changes nothing is pure cost.

06 · Galesic & Bosnjak 2009

Keep it short

Longer stated length, fewer starts and completions. The direction, not a percentage.

Your draft against the six rules · 0/6 in place

Tick each rule your draft already meets.

One thing at a time. “Is our content useful and timely?” cannot be acted on, because you cannot tell which half a “no” refers to. The government’s stated test is that every respondent should interpret the question the same way, interpret it as intended, be able to answer accurately and be willing to answer.

Neutral wording. The GSS guidance says “you should avoid questions that lead respondents towards a particular response”, and balances them with phrases such as “if any”, “if at all” or “if anything”.

Pew’s Iraq experiment shows the scale of the effect: one added clause moved support from 68% to 43%.

Plain language. Skip jargon and internal terms. Respondent burden is a formally defined concept: the degree to which participation is perceived as difficult, time consuming or emotionally stressful.

Type follows goal. And a firm line from Krosnick and Presser: “it seems best to avoid agree/disagree, true/false, and yes/no formats altogether and instead ask questions using rating scales that explicitly display the evaluative dimension.”

Only what you will act on. This one is judgement, not evidence, and we are labelling it as such. It follows from the length finding rather than being separately proven.

Short. The randomised evidence: the longer the stated length, the fewer respondents started and completed. Later questions also got shorter response times, higher item non-response and shorter open answers.

The direction is solid. Any specific percentage you have been quoted is not from this study.

16/ anonymity and the law

Is your “anonymous” member survey actually anonymous?

Usually less so than the invitation email promises. This matters both ethically — members answer differently when they believe they can be identified — and legally.

Pseudonymous

A tracked link is not anonymity

If responses arrive with a unique link, or can be joined back to membership records, they are pseudonymous. The ICO is unambiguous: “Pseudonymous information is still personal data and the law applies to it.”

Re-identification

Small segments give people away

Anonymised results fall outside UK GDPR — but only while people cannot be re-identified. The ICO warns that combining anonymised results with other information you hold can re-identify individuals. In a body of 400 members, “female trustees in Scotland” is a name.

Statistical purposes

Acting on individuals changes the basis

Processing for statistical purposes requires that you either “not use the results to make decisions or justify measures about people” or render them anonymous. Using survey answers to flag individual members as at-risk is not statistical-purposes processing.

The practical version

Decide before you send whether the survey is anonymous or identified, and then tell members the truth about which. An identified survey is entirely legitimate and often more useful: it lets you follow up. What is not legitimate is promising anonymity and shipping a tracked link.

Can you call your survey anonymous?

  1. 01Does every member get the same link, not a unique tracked one?

  2. 02Is there no way to join responses back to membership records?

  3. 03Are small segments merged before you report them?

  4. 04Will you keep answers out of decisions about individual members?

Answer the 4 questions to see where you stand.

Drawn from the ICO’s guidance on pseudonymisation and research-related processing. Not legal advice.

17/ response rates

What response rate should you expect? Nobody credible knows

We went looking for a benchmark and could not find one.

That is worth saying plainly, because a great deal of content in this market quotes numbers like “15–30% is typical for membership surveys” with no sample, no denominator, no field dates and no methodology.

The one sector figure with a published denominator

Marketing General Inc.’s own flagship benchmarking survey: 48,592 email invitations, 804 responses, over a six-week field period. That is not a member-survey benchmark — it surveys association staff — but it is the only figure we found where you can check the arithmetic. MGI 2024 report, methodology section · US industry survey.

How often associations survey their members

  • Annually38%
  • More often29%
  • Every two years22%
38% of associations survey members annually, with a further 29% doing so more often and 22% every two years. A self-selected sample of association professionals, so read it as a sector habit rather than a population statistic. Marketing General Inc., 2024 · US industry survey.

None — primary benchmarks for member survey response rates

We checked MGI’s full 2024 report, MemberWise, ASAE benchmarking material and iMIS, plus academic search. No primary or peer-reviewed benchmark exists. Anyone quoting one is quoting a vendor blog. Verified 27 July 2026.

The levers you control · 0/5 in place

Tick the ones your next survey already does.

What to do instead of benchmarking. Benchmark against yourself.

Your own response rate last year, on the same list, at the same time of year, is a far more useful comparator than any published figure. It is the only one where you know the denominator.

If you want the number to go up, the levers are known even where the benchmarks are not: make it shorter, say how long it takes and be honest about it, send it from a person.

Then tell members what changed because of the last one, and ask at a moment when they have just had an experience worth describing.

18/ which survey

The five survey types, and which questions belong in each

This page is the question bank. Each survey type has its own page with the full method: when to send it, who to, and what to do with the answers.

The card below follows your pick from your survey. Clubs get the club page first, because a season and a clubhouse need different questions from a profession.

Your next pageProfessional body · Satisfaction and value

Member satisfaction survey

The annual survey: satisfaction, value and NPS, and how to read the score.

Want the satisfaction and value survey designed and run for a professional body? It starts with 15 minutes. Book a call.

SurveyWhen to sendWhat it tells you
Annual member surveyOnce a year, same timeA number you can trend
New member surveyInside the first 90 daysWhether onboarding is landing
Member retention surveyWhen behaviour flags riskWho is at risk, and why
Member exit surveyJust after a member leavesWhy they left, while it is fresh

→ The triggered surveys are the ones that save members.

A rule of thumb for choosing: if you want a number you can trend, run an annual survey. If you want to save a member, run a short one triggered by their behaviour. The second kind is almost always more valuable and almost always neglected: see what a retention rate actually measures.

19/ what we checked

Four things we checked and will not claim

A page about asking good questions should say what it could not answer.

Each of these is quoted widely elsewhere. We looked for a primary source and did not find one that holds up.

Claim 01

A member survey response-rate benchmark

None exists from any primary or peer-reviewed source. The “15–30% is typical” figure has no published denominator.

Dan Keegan, Founder, Membership Quest and GTM Quest

Written by Dan KeeganFounder, Membership Quest and GTM Quest · GTM Quest ↗

20/ questions

Membership survey questions FAQs

A good membership survey mixes a few question types around a clear goal. Most include an overall satisfaction rating, a loyalty or NPS question, a value-for-money question, benefit-usage and engagement questions, and one or two open-text questions for the reasons behind the scores. The exact set depends on the survey’s purpose — onboarding, annual satisfaction, at-risk, exit or engagement — so this page groups ready-to-use questions by theme for you to pick from.

A good survey question asks one thing at a time, in plain language, without leading the member to a particular answer, and uses a response type that matches what you’ll do with the answer. It is also worth asking only if you will act on the result — every extra question adds drop-off. The UK Government’s own questionnaire design guidance puts the test this way: every respondent should interpret the question in the same way, interpret it as the researcher intended, be able to answer accurately, and be willing to answer.

Fewer than you think. Our guidance: onboarding and at-risk pulse surveys work best at three to five questions and under two minutes; an annual satisfaction or engagement survey can run to eight to ten questions. Experimental evidence confirms the direction — a randomised study in Public Opinion Quarterly found that the longer the stated length of a questionnaire, the fewer respondents started and completed it, and that later questions attract shorter, emptier answers. What that evidence does not support is any specific rule like “every question over twelve costs you five per cent”, so this page does not offer one.

The common membership survey question types are: rating scales (1–5 or 1–10) for satisfaction and agreement; NPS (0–10) for loyalty; single choice for a definitive answer; multi-select for benefit usage and preferences; yes/no for a clear binary; and open text for the reasons behind the numbers. Each has a job — scales to trend, choice to decide, open text to understand — and the best surveys use a mix.

Both, in balance. Closed questions are quick for members to answer and easy for you to trend and compare, so they should form the backbone of the survey. Open-ended questions are where the real reasons surface, but they take effort to answer and to analyse — so use just one or two, placed after the closed questions, to explain the scores rather than replace them.

Keep the wording neutral and specific. The UK Government Statistical Service guidance is explicit that you should avoid questions that lead respondents towards a particular response, and that you should balance questions using phrases such as “if any”, “if at all” or “if anything”. Do not combine two questions into one. Survey-methodology research also recommends avoiding agree/disagree and yes/no formats where possible, because they invite acquiescence — the tendency to agree with an assertion regardless of its content — and instead using rating scales that explicitly display the evaluative dimension.

Between five and seven, and label every point rather than just the ends. The UK Government Statistical Service recommends a minimum of five points, says seven gives more detailed answers, and advises always including a neutral option in the middle. Krosnick and Presser’s review of the survey-methodology literature concludes that seven-point scales are probably optimal in many instances, that reliability is higher when all points are labelled with words, and that adding midpoints improved the reliability and validity of ratings. Those two positions are compatible: five to seven points, all labelled, midpoint included.

Not under the direct-marketing rules, provided it is genuine research. The ICO is explicit that genuine market research does not count as direct marketing — but that if a survey includes any promotional material, or collects details to use in future marketing campaigns, it becomes direct marketing and the PECR rules apply. For a not-for-profit that includes promoting your own aims and ideals. You still need a lawful basis under UK GDPR to process members’ personal data, which for a membership body surveying its own members is usually legitimate interests. The practical trap is bundling a renewal prompt or an event plug into a member survey, which converts the whole email into marketing.

Start with the two the Lawn Tennis Association calls “golden questions” — how likely members are to recommend the club, and how likely they are to still be a member in two years — then add questions only for the areas the committee will act on: playing facilities, coaching, the clubhouse and social side, fees and membership categories, volunteering and communication. The LTA suggests surveying towards the end of the season, when members have used the club most, and covering one part of the club at a time rather than everything at once.

Ask about each need twice: how important it is to the member, and how satisfied they are with how you provide it, both on fully labelled five-point scales. Plotting the two answers — importance–performance analysis, from Martilla and James in the Journal of Marketing in 1977 — shows which needs to concentrate on (important but under-served) and where you may be over-investing. Open with one or two open questions, such as the biggest challenge a member faces in the year ahead, so members can name needs you did not list.

Often less anonymous than organisations think. If the survey uses a unique or tracked link, or the responses can be joined back to membership records, it is pseudonymous rather than anonymous — and the ICO is clear that pseudonymous information is still personal data and the law still applies to it. Genuinely anonymised results fall outside UK GDPR, but only where individuals are not and can no longer be identified, including by combining the results with other information you hold. If you promise members anonymity, make sure the survey actually delivers it.

15 minutes · video or phone

Take the questions. Keep the answers.

Everything on this page is free to use. Book 15 minutes if you want the harder part — designing the survey, running it and turning what comes back into a retention plan.

  1. 0115 minutes, video or phone
  2. 02The one decision your survey has to inform
  3. 03A question set cut to what you will act on
  4. 04A plain next step
Prefer email? hello@membership.quest →

Pick a day that suits · live availability

Work with us

Take the questions. Keep the answers.

Everything on this page is free to use. If you want the harder part — designing the survey, running it and turning what comes back into a retention plan — that is what we do. From £1,500/month.

22/ sources

Every claim, and where it came from

The guidance on this page is cited. Where something is judgement rather than evidence, or where no credible benchmark exists, the page says so instead of borrowing authority it hasn’t got.

  1. ONS Data Quality Hub / Government Analysis Function — Questionnaire design guidance — 14 March 2023, page marked “under review”UK government primary
  2. Government Statistical Service — GSS harmonised standards and guidance — the harmonised ethnicity standard dates from 2011 and is under 2026 reviewUK government primary
  3. Pew Research Center — Writing survey questions — question wording and order effects; source of the Iraq wording experiment (68% vs 43%) and the order effect (45% vs 37%)Research organisation primary
  4. Krosnick & Presser — “Question and Questionnaire Design”, Handbook of Survey Research, 2nd ed., 2010 — full text free; source for 7-point scales, labelling all points, and avoiding agree/disagreePeer-reviewed
  5. Likert — “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes”, Archives of Psychology No. 140, 1932 — the original five-point format, full text freePrimary research, 1932
  6. Galesic & Bosnjak — “Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality”, Public Opinion Quarterly 73(2), 2009 — abstract free, full text paywalled; supports direction, not a coefficientPeer-reviewed
  7. Reichheld — “The One Number You Need to Grow”, Harvard Business Review 81(12), December 2003 — the origin of NPS, including the 0–10 scale and all three bandsPractitioner article
  8. Keiningham et al. — “A Longitudinal Examination of Net Promoter and Firm Revenue Growth”, Journal of Marketing 71(3), 2007 — fails to replicate NPS’s claimed superiority; note: several authors worked for an NPS competitorPeer-reviewed
  9. Bain & Company — Measuring your Net Promoter Score — authoritative for what the question IS, commercially interested on whether it worksTrademark holder
  10. Information Commissioner’s Office — Guide to PECR — genuine market research is not direct marketing (updated 20 August 2025)UK regulator
  11. Information Commissioner’s Office — Identifying direct marketing — and “sugging” (updated 20 August 2025): research used to enable marketing IS marketingUK regulator
  12. Information Commissioner’s Office — Pseudonymisation — pseudonymous information is still personal dataUK regulator
  13. Information Commissioner’s Office — Research-related processing and statistical purposes (15 June 2023)UK regulator
  14. Marketing General Inc. — 2024 Membership Marketing Benchmarking Report — the disclosed 804 / 48,592 methodology, member-research frequency, and first-year renewal (median 75%, n = 333)Industry survey, US
  15. Lawn Tennis Association — A self-service guide to membership surveys, October 2020 — the two “golden questions”, end-of-season timing, one area per surveyUK sport governing body guidance
  16. Sport England — Club Matters launch — free club support including Club Views, a survey tool for asking members and volunteersUK government arm’s-length body
  17. Martilla & James — “Importance-Performance Analysis”, Journal of Marketing 41(1), 1977 — the importance/performance pair and the four quadrantsPeer-reviewed
  18. University of Florida IFAS Extension — Visually plotting importance and satisfaction to identify clients’ needs (Chaudhary & Warner) — IPA used for needs assessmentUniversity extension guidance, US