Loading...
Loading...
Free Membership Tool
It is widely cited that winning a new member costs around five times more than keeping one. Put your own numbers in and see exactly how much you could save by retaining members rather than replacing them.
The Scenario
The members you need to win — or could keep instead.
Marketing and sales spend to win a single new member.
How much more acquisition costs than retention. Harvard Business Review cites 5–25×.
Used to show the revenue these members represent.
The Comparison
Keep them through retention for
£6,000
vs £30,000 to acquire the same 200 — a 80% saving
£24k
Saved by retaining
£60k
Annual revenue at stake
Acquisition will always be part of the mix — but pound for pound, keeping the members you have is the cheaper way to protect £60,000 of annual revenue.
Spend smarter — book a free consultationEstimates only, for planning purposes. Figures are not stored and nothing leaves your browser.
How It Works
One of the most durable findings in marketing is that it costs far more to win a new customer than to keep an existing one.
Harvard Business Review puts the gap at five to 25 times more expensive to acquire than to retain, depending on the industry.
For membership organisations the gap is often wide, because an existing member already understands the value, already pays, and only needs a reason to stay rather than a reason to join.
We default this tool to the conservative end of that range — 5× — so you can dial it to your own reality.
This comparator makes the trade-off concrete.
Set the number of members at stake, your cost to acquire one, and the acquisition-to-retention ratio you believe applies.
It shows the cost of winning those members through acquisition against the cost of keeping the same number through retention, and the saving between the two.
The takeaway is not that acquisition is wrong — you will always need it to grow and to replace natural attrition.
It is that many organisations quietly overspend on the front door while members slip out the back.
Rebalancing toward retention usually protects revenue more cheaply, which frees up acquisition budget to deliver real net growth.
To see what those leaking members are worth, pair this with the churn cost calculator and the revenue growth forecaster.
The membership sector gives us a real-world version of the multiple, not just the marketing cliché.
The IMPACTS Value Study found that serving and retaining a renewing member costs roughly $4–5 a year, against $20–25 for a new one — almost exactly the 5× that Harvard Business Review cites as the low end of its range.
How We Calculate This
Acquisition cost = members × cost to acquire one · retention cost = acquisition cost ÷ acquisition-to-retention ratio · saving = acquisition cost − retention costThe default ratio of 5× sits at the conservative end of Harvard Business Review's 5–25× range and is corroborated by association-specific cost data below. Adjust it to your own channels.
Benchmarks & Sources
Questions & Answers
Harvard Business Review reports acquisition is five to 25 times more expensive than retention, depending on the industry. The exact multiple varies by sector and channel, but research consistently points the same way: retention is materially cheaper. This tool defaults to the conservative 5x; set your own ratio to see the effect.
Members at stake × cost to acquire one = acquisition cost. Divide by your acquisition-to-retention ratio for the retention cost of keeping the same members. The difference is your potential saving.
No — acquisition drives growth and replaces attrition. The point is balance: many organisations over-invest in acquisition while losing members out the back door. Protecting existing members usually defends revenue more cheaply.
Model every lever of membership growth.
Book a free consultation and we’ll help you balance acquisition and retention so every pound works harder on member growth.
Book Free Consultation